Publication Ethic

Author Ethics

1. Report: The author is required to report the research process and results fairly, clearly, and thoroughly to the editor, and to store the research data carefully and safely.
2. Originality and Plagiarism: The author must ensure that the manuscript is an original work, written by the author, and not the result or idea of someone else. References must be accompanied by proper citations.
3. Resubmission: Authors are required to ensure that the submitted manuscript has not been submitted or published in another journal. In the event of a double application, the editorial board has the right to reject it.
4. Author Status: Authors must provide information about their competencies or qualifications that are in accordance with the published field of science, as well as ensure that all authors are listed correctly (co-author).
5. Writing Errors: Authors are obliged to notify the editor immediately of any errors in writing, including names, affiliations, citations, or other elements that affect the content of the manuscript.
6. Disclosure and Conflict of Interest: Authors must understand the ethics of publication to avoid conflicts of interest, so that the publishing process runs smoothly.

Editor's Ethics:

1. Publication Decisions: Editors must ensure that the review process is transparent, objective, fair, and wise in order to make decisions regarding the acceptance or rejection of manuscripts.
2. Publication Information: Editors should ensure that the guidelines for authors are clearly available and accessible, both in print and online.
3. Peer-Review Distribution: Editors should ensure that manuscripts are sent to the right reviewers and clearly explain the terms and review process.
4. Objectivity and Neutrality: Editors must be neutral, fair, and objective regardless of the author's gender, race, religion, or nationality.
5. Confidentiality: Editors must maintain the confidentiality of the author's information and submitted manuscripts.
6. Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest: Editors are required to understand publication ethics to avoid conflicts of interest, so that the process runs well.

Reviewer Ethics:

1. Objectivity and Neutrality: Reviewers must be fair, objective, and independent in conducting reviews, without regard to the author's identity or background.
2. Reference Clarity: Reviewers must ensure that the references and citations used in the manuscript are accurate and accountable. If any errors are found, the reviewer must immediately notify the editor.
3. Review Effectiveness: Reviewers are required to review the manuscript within the stipulated time (maximum 2 weeks), and if additional time is needed, they must immediately inform the editor.
4. Disclosure and Conflict of Interest: Reviewers must understand publication ethics to avoid conflicts of interest and ensure the process runs smoothly.

Journal Manager Ethics

1. Decision Making: Journal managers must explain the mission and goals of the organization, especially related to the policies and decisions of journal publishing without personal interest.
2. Consideration: Journal managers must give editors and reviewers freedom in their work, as well as maintain the privacy of authors.
3. Guarantees and Promotions: Journal managers must protect intellectual property rights and be transparent in managing third-party funds. They must also promote the results of publication by guaranteeing benefits for manuscript users.
4. Disclosure and Conflict of Interest: Journal managers are required to understand publication ethics to avoid conflicts of interest with other parties, so that the publishing process runs smoothly.